← 回到 TOKEN2049 Singapore 2026

Animoca Brands Yat Siu:AI agent 讓元宇宙重返現實,數位主權新時代

When Games Become Reality: The Return of the Metaverse

  • Yat Siu Animoca Brands 共同創辦人暨執行董事長

影片

影片與逐字稿來源:TOKEN2049

場次摘要

Animoca Brands 共同創辦人 Yat Siu 分享元宇宙的未來:AI agent 將成為鏈上經濟的主角,區塊鏈其實是為機器經濟設計的 24/7 金融基礎建設。未來每個人都會有多個 agent,這些 agent 會成為經濟參與者、資產持有者,甚至管理 DAO。數位主權與 agent 擁有權將成為新網路時代的關鍵,去中心化與區塊鏈是唯一保障。

值得記下的 5 件事

  1. 區塊鏈可能成為 AI 經濟的結算層,支援代理人直接交易與跨鏈操作。
  2. 全天候運作的區塊鏈,能配合代理人不受人類作息限制的交易需求。
  3. 元宇宙的新方向可能是代理人在虛擬世界中運作,再把結果帶進現實生活。
  4. 代理人可能承接 DAO 管理工作,降低人類注意力與協調能力的限制。
  5. 代理人的主導權與資料可攜性,會影響使用者能否持續保有多年累積的工作能力。

逐字稿

從 CryptoKitties 到區塊鏈普及

元宇宙的回歸,究竟會是什麼樣子?讓我先問一下,現場有多少人還記得 CryptoKitties?舉個手吧。這張投影片是 2017 年的,那時候區塊鏈還很新,Ethereum 幾乎被塞爆,僅僅是幾百萬美元的數位貓咪交易就讓網路癱瘓。今天,隨著穩定幣和區塊鏈技術的進步,加上像 Franklin Templeton、BlackRock 這些機構進場,區塊鏈的交易量已經來到數兆美元規模,區塊鏈已經變得可擴展,全球大約有 8 億人持有加密貨幣。Return of the metaverse. Exactly what does that look like? Okay. So let me first start off. How many people here still remember CryptoKitties? Raise your hand. There we go. All right, fine. So the reason why I'm putting up that slide is this was in 2017, and that was a time when blockchain, when Ethereum basically melted. When there were only a few million dollars worth of digital cats being sold. Of course, today, with stablecoins and with advancements in blockchain and all the main institutions like, you know, Franklin Templeton and BlackRock, you know, you've got basically trillions of dollars of transaction volumes. Basically, blockchain has become scalable, and we have also now something like almost 800 million people in the world who own crypto.

不過這裡有個問題,只有不到 10% 的持幣者真的有在鏈上活動。DeFi 和整個鏈上經濟的成長,遠遠落後於持有加密貨幣的人數。也許我們該換個角度想,並不是加密貨幣不重要,而是人類體驗加密貨幣的方式還是太困難。你們有多少人還在用 MetaMask?這產品很棒,但對一般人來說真的很難用。我媽不會用,我女兒也不會用,他們沒辦法處理助記詞。十年過去了,我們還是沒解決這個問題。But we do have a little bit of problem in the space. Only less than 10% of them are actually on-chain. So DeFi and the whole on-chain economy has been actually not growing in comparison to people owning crypto. But perhaps one way to think about this is not that crypto isn't relevant, it's that perhaps the human experience of crypto remains very, very difficult. I mean, for those of you in crypto, how many of you are still using MetaMask? It's a great product, by the way, but it's harsh. My mom will never use it. My daughter won't use it. They can't handle the seed phrases. It's kind of tough. And even 10 years in, we still haven't matured out of that kind of scenario.

區塊鏈其實是為 AI 機器人設計的

但如果說,這些區塊鏈技術其實不是為人類設計的,而是我們人類只是為未來的 AI agent 做的 POC 測試呢?讓我解釋一下。我們認為區塊鏈其實是 AI 經濟的原生結算層。你可能在很多演講都聽過這個觀點,我就不多說,但這對 AI 來說是很自然的選擇。區塊鏈不是為人類速度設計的,而是為機器速度設計的,有容錯、去中心化,能支撐數兆美元的商業活動,像 X402 payments 或 agent 之間的直接交易,跨鏈對 agent 來說也很簡單。But what if all the technology that we've seen built on blockchain was, in fact, not meant for humans, and that we as humans were basically the POC for agents to come? Let me sort of elaborate a bit. First, we think that blockchain is the native settlement layer for the AI economy. You've probably heard this in a number of talks. I won't sort of talk about it too much, but it's natural for them. Basically, the blockchain was not designed for human speed. It was designed for machine speed. It has fault tolerance. It's decentralized. Trillions of dollars of commerce can actually happen through, you know, X402 payments or direct transactions between agents. Through essentially a direct settlement layer on chain that is direct, and it can also go cross-chain for an agent. It's super easy.

第二點是,代幣其實天生就是機器經濟的數位持有資產。所以現在,一開始我們是從迷因幣這類東西起步,並且用虛擬、數位原生的代幣玩得很開心,也建立了我們自己的網路效應。但今天,代幣已經代表了股票、權益、商品以及其他各種收益型態。它們仍然是持有資產,只不過是數位版本的那種資產。但主要的買家會是人類,還是其實是代理人?我們認為,這其實就是代理人將透過這種數位價值和貨幣的形式來進行交易的方式。而代理人天生就是這類代幣的使用者。傳統金融無法為 AI 開戶。The second thing is that tokens actually are naturally kind of digital bearer assets for the machine economy. So right now, initially we started with things like meme coins and had some fun with virtually digitally native tokens and built our own network effects. But today, Tokens are representative of stocks and equities and commodities and other kind of forms of yield. They are still bearer assets, except they are digital versions of that. But are the principal buyers going to be humans or, in fact, agents? And we think that's actually the way in which agents are going to transact through this form of digital value and currency. And agents are naturally users of these type of tokens. Traditional finance. Cannot bank an AI.

銀行要能夠給一個代理人開設銀行帳戶,這件事還需要很長一段時間,甚至可能永遠不會發生。但我們知道,這些代理人會越來越聰明。他們實際上正在變得更有智慧。他們在某些任務上的智商已經提升,最終會在我們人類所做的大多數任務上都變得更優秀。那麼,現在缺少的是什麼?他們需要一種權力的形式,也就是金錢。他們要怎麼獲得金錢?這不會是透過銀行帳戶。It's going to be a long time before a bank has the ability, if ever, to give an agent a bank account. But we know that agents are going to get smarter. They're actually getting more intelligent. Their IQ is getting better at some tasks, eventually at most of the tasks that we do as people. So what's missing? They need to have a form of power, which is money. How do they get it? That's not going to be a bank account.

這就像是在菲律賓等地,原本沒有銀行帳戶或無法開戶的人,現在透過加密貨幣錢包,基本上就能擁有銀行服務一樣。整個去中心化金融(DeFi)的世界,所有的資金池、所有的收益,坦白說,所有DeFi銀行的功能,都變得對他們可用,基本上就是為了那個機器經濟而存在。It's going to be the same way that people who didn't have a bank account or couldn't get one in places like the Philippines, now through a crypto wallet, basically become bankable, and the entire world of DeFi, all the vaults, all the yield, and frankly all the DeFi banking capabilities become available to them, essentially for that machine economy.

區塊鏈是 24/7 機器金融系統

簡單來說,區塊鏈和加密貨幣就是為機器設計的完美金融系統,全天候 24/7 運作。你想想,為什麼大家週末要交易 tokenized assets?因為傳統股市週末關門,但區塊鏈永遠不打烊,沒有熔斷、沒有上下班、沒有假期。能夠 24 小時不間斷交易和轉移價值的,不是人類,因為我們還要睡覺,而是 agent。這個系統就是為 agent 而生。So in simple, fast conclusion, you could say that the blockchain and crypto is the perfect financial system for machines. Designed for 24/7 operations. Just think, for instance, why are people so keen on trading tokenized assets over the weekend? Because a regular stock market is closed, but the blockchain continues to operate 24/7. There is no circuit breakers. There's no 9 to 5. There's no holidays, no Christmas. Just go. What are the systems that can trade and transact and basically move money and value 24/7? Not a human. We still have to sleep. It's going to be an agent, and therefore this is a system designed for that.

舉例來說,這代表什麼意思呢?如果全世界都變得更加代理化(agentic),我們將不再以傳統的方式探索網路。HTTP 這種方式將會消失。我們大家都會透過 API、CLI、MCP,當然還有代幣化類型的資產來搜尋網路。想想看你上次在 Gemini 或 ChatGPT 上,他們給你一堆網站連結時,你真的有點進去那些網站嗎?還是你只是看了他們給你的摘要,覺得那樣就夠了?事實上,根據許多說法,許多依賴 Google 點擊流量的網站,他們的廣告收入已經下降了 80%。所以你必須要做好代理準備,讓你的內容能夠被代理讀取。Now, what that means, for instance, so if the whole world becomes more agentic, we're no longer going to be discovering the web in the traditional way. It won't be HTTP. It's going away. We're all going to be searching it through APIs, CLIs, MCPs, and of course tokenized type of assets. I mean, think about the last time when you were on Gemini or ChatGPT and they gave you a bunch of websites. Did you actually click through to the website, or did you just take the summary of what it said and said that was sufficient? So by many accounts, in fact, advertising revenue for a lot of these websites that relied on Google click-throughs has dropped by 80%. So you have to be agent-ready and agent-readable.

但在這個背景下,實際上發生的事情是,代理人將會彼此直接進行各種交易。而且他們不僅僅會進行特定的 X402 支付,他們還會進行其他形式的交易,或是新的系統,無論是什麼。他們可以協助規劃你的旅程,也可以使用不同的代理人。這些可能是微支付,你知道的,就是那些你用信用卡無法做到的事情。但這些你可以在鏈上完成,比如說極小數額的分幣、甚至是更小的微單位,他們可以進行交易,基本上就是完成一筆交易並購買某些東西。這樣的情況會越來越自然地發生。而當然,審計這些交易的方式將會是區塊鏈。But in the backdrop, what happens is that agents are going to be doing all these direct transactions with each other. And they're not going to be doing just specific X402 payments. They're going to sort of do other forms of transactions, new systems, whichever. They can help plan your trip, and they could use different agents. It could be microtransactions, you know, things that you can't do with a credit card. But things you can do on chain, like the fraction of a cent of a, you know, micro fraction of something, they can transact and basically sort of do a transaction and basically purchase something. And this will happen more and more naturally. And of course, the way to audit that is going to be the blockchain.

Agent 時代的應用與體驗革命

在這個新環境下,傳統的廣告注意力經濟會消失,一切都變成無摩擦、微支付、極度客製化,因為 agent 會寫程式。當 agent 能快速寫程式,你根本不需要傳統 app 或軟體,agent 會直接把你要的應用送到你的 inbox、WhatsApp 或 Telegram,完全照你的需求客製化,還能跨平台、跨應用。預測未來 80% 的 app 和軟體會消失。So in this environment, you basically no longer have the traditional advertising attention economy. Everything becomes frictionless. Everything is running in these microtransactions. Everything is heavily customizable because the agent can code. Now let me elaborate on that a little bit. When an agent can code everything quickly and easily, you no longer need to have apps and software as you see it. You're going to have an agent deliver the application just how you want it in your inbox or in your WhatsApp or in your Telegram, right? And they're going to customize these applications in the way that you already sort of want to experience it, and they can speak and be compatible and portable in other ways. In fact, the prediction is that 80% of apps and software as you know it is going to go away.

現在讓我快速切入元宇宙這個主題,因為這在這裡是一個很大的話題。我們在2021、2022年時曾經認為,我們會花更多時間在線上,戴著這些護目鏡或其他裝置,因為那時是COVID疫情。我們都相信,外面有一種致命的病毒,我們將無法像以前那樣自由地與人見面,所以我們會全部進入虛擬世界。結果事實並非如此。然而,這是否代表元宇宙已經死了,像很多人所說的那樣?其實,我們認為,隨著代理人的出現,情況正好相反。Now let me quickly move into sort of the whole metaverse thing, since that was a big topic here. One of the things that we thought back in 2021, 22 is that we're going to spend a lot more time. Online, with these goggles and other things, because it was COVID. We all believed that, you know, there's a deadly virus out there. We will no longer be able to meet people as freely as we wanted to, so we're going to go all virtual. Turned out that that was not quite true. However, does it mean that the metaverse is dead, as a lot of people talk about? Actually, we think quite the opposite with agents.

也許這並不是關於我們花更多時間在網路上,而是關於 AI 智能代理在虛擬世界中誕生,這些 AI 智能代理可以在現實生活中為我們做事。換句話說,這仍然是元宇宙,但不是我們進入其中,而是它們來到我們身邊。Maybe it wasn't about us spending more time online, but instead it was about AI agents coming to life in the virtual plane, which are these AI agents, but that can do things for us in real life. In other words, it's still the metaverse, but instead of us being in it, they are coming to us.

AI agent 進入現實世界,重塑生活

現在很多人已經在用 agent 幫忙排行程、訂機票、幫你省錢、甚至幫你賺錢。連 play to earn 的概念都變成現實,只是現在的 play to earn 不是農 token,而是創造真實價值,像幫你建網站、幫你省錢、甚至幫你遛狗。AI agent 正在重塑實體世界,但本質上還是元宇宙的產物。And think for those of you who are using agents today, They're handling your calendar, they're doing flight bookings, they may be saving you money somewhere, making money for you. Even the crypto concepts of things like play to earn actually have come to life, except the play to earn construct isn't farming some token. It's actually creating real value in real life, effectively doing things like, I don't know, building websites or saving you money, maybe help you walk the dog, all that kind of stuff. AI agents are reshaping the physical world, but they are actually metaversal in construction.

在這個意義上,這也是我們在推動 Hello Minds 這個平台的原因,這是我們自己的代理平台,後端有區塊鏈技術,AI 代理會變成一群角色。大家現在普遍談論 AI 代理時,都是以單一代理來管理你所有事情的方式在討論,但事實上,你真的希望只有一個代理來管理你所有的事情嗎?如果他們幫你管理所有事情,那你能把這個代理分享給你的伴侶或工作同事嗎?你大概不會這麼做,因為他們會知道你所有的事情。但你可能會想要把這些事情分門別類:一個代理給你的家人,一個代理給你的朋友,一個代理給工作,對吧?也許還有專門處理特定任務的代理,對吧?這就是我們認為未來會發生的事情。So in that sense, and that's kind of what we're pushing with Hello Minds, which is our own agentic platform that has blockchain on the back, AI agents become a cast of characters. Everyone is generally talking about AI agents in the way where it's a single agent that manages everything for you, but actually. Do you really want one agent managing everything for you? If they manage everything for you, can you share that agent with your partner or your work colleagues? You probably wouldn't do that because they'd know everything about you. But you might want to compartmentalize that: one agent for your family, one agent for your friends, one agent for work, right? Maybe for specific tasks, right? That's what we think is going to happen.

這不僅讓代理的情境管理變得更容易,也讓我們人類的情境管理變得更簡單。因此,這些代理就像是一群角色,就像電玩遊戲裡的角色,不管是像《模擬市民》還是某種文明類型的遊戲,不同的是,這些代理擁有真正的智慧,能夠在現實生活中幫助你。It's much easier not just for the context management for the agent. But also for context management for us as humans. So agents become a cast of characters, much like a video game, whether it's like The Sims or some kind of civilization game, except they're ones that have true intelligence that can help you in real life.

AI agent 實際應用與遊戲化體驗

舉幾個你可以用 Minds 和代理人做到的例子,我自己有一個代理人可以幫我在香港的日常採購中降低我的雜貨帳單。這還滿有趣的。你知道,雞蛋的價格看起來很便宜,但如果你每天都買,累積起來就會變成幾千美元的花費。你可以有代理人幫你處理投資。你也可以有代理人——這是我個人特別喜歡的一個——幫你管理你的 Instagram 帳號。如果你是小型企業,代理人可以很輕鬆地幫你發佈影片、貼文等等。So some examples that you can do with Minds and with agents, I've got one that lowers my grocery bill on daily purchases in Hong Kong. That's kind of fun. You know, price of eggs, it seems cheap, but when you do that every day, it compounds to a value of thousands of dollars. You have agents that can handle your investments. You have agents, and this is one of my sort of personal favorites, that can handle your Instagram account. If you're a small business, it's very easy for them to post videos and make postings for you and so forth.

所以,思考整個 AI 智能代理環境的方式,基本上就像是為你的個人 AI 打造一個可互動的家,而不是把它當作一個工具。這關乎社交、娛樂和樂趣。它就像是在玩一個遊戲,實際上就像人生遊戲一樣,如果你願意這麼說,不同的是,這個遊戲的結果會對真實任務產生實際影響,帶來現實生活中的進步,這也是你可以用 Hello Minds 以及坦白說其他智能代理做到的事情,只不過這個是多代理的。而這個環境,如果你也下載這個應用程式,你會看到它以一種遊戲化的方式呈現,我們認為這是大多數使用者能夠輕鬆轉換並接受的方式。And so the way to think of the entire environment for AI agents is basically like a playable home for your personal AI, instead of thinking of it as a tool. It's about social. It's about entertainment. It's about fun. It's like playing a game, effectively like the game of life, if you will, except the outcome is real impact for real tasks, real-life progress, what you can do essentially with Hello Minds and frankly other agents as well, except this one is one that is multi-agent. And the environment, if you download the app as well, is one where you can see it in a gamified kind of way, which we think is a way that most users will translate easily to.

你們在場的各位大概都是創業家,你們是創辦人,你們對這個領域非常非常了解,所以你們已經知道自己想要什麼。但我們發現,大多數人當他們獲得一個代理人時,當他們問代理人類似「你希望我做什麼?」這樣的問題時,他們其實不知道該問什麼,因為他們不知道該問什麼問題,因為他們從來沒想過要「雇用」某個人,對吧?所以我們在遊戲世界或虛擬世界裡看到的這整個體驗,這幾十年來我們經歷的模擬,其實只是虛擬世界的模擬,本質上是一種遊戲化的體驗,那這是在做什麼呢?它在很多方面其實是在模仿現實生活。All of you are here probably entrepreneurs, you're founders, you understand the space really, really well, so you already know what you want. But most people, what we found is when they get an agent and they ask them the question, something like, What would you like me to do? they don't know what to ask because they don't know the question to ask because they don't think of hiring someone, right? So this entire experience that we see in the gaming world or in virtual worlds, the simulation that we've experienced over the last few decades, which are really just simulations of the virtual world, of essentially a gamified experience, is doing what? It was in many ways mimicking real life.

它模仿了社會現實生活以及現實生活中的各種活動。你可以學到一些經濟學知識。你會學到貿易。你會學到友誼。你會學到遊戲行為。現在,這一切正以這些 AI 智能代理的形式進入現實世界,而我們所受過的所有訓練也將派上用場。It was mimicking social real life as well as activities in real life. You can learn about economics a little bit. You learn about trade. You learn about friendships. You learn about game actions. Now that is coming to the physical world in the form of these AI agents and everything that we've been trained for.

AI agent 爆發成長與 DAO 新型態

在我們開始說這聽起來很瘋狂,或者說這只是一個遊戲,這跟現實生活非常不同之前,我想提醒大家,Nvidia 當初其實就是從遊戲領域起家的,最早是在做這些 3D 環境的模擬,基本上就是用遊戲化的方式來模擬現實世界。在成為整個 AI 產業引擎,甚至一開始成為 Bitcoin 挖礦社群的動力之前,Nvidia 就是這樣起步的。所以,我們相信未來會有數千億個智能代理(agents)。即使是最保守的估計,也會有五十億到一百億個。我們之所以這麼相信,是因為如果你問自己,未來三到五年你會擁有多少個代理,大家最常見的答案是三到五個。如果你在舊金山,這個數字甚至會是幾百個。And before we start saying this sounds crazy, you know, this is a game, this is very different from real life, I'll remind you that Nvidia, which of course started from gaming, was originally doing simulations of these 3D environments and basically real-world simulations in a gamified way. Before it became the engine for this entire AI and, frankly, Bitcoin mining community at start. So, we believe there's going to be hundreds of billions of agents. At the smallest estimates, 50 to 100. And the reason we believe that is if you ask yourself how many agents you think you're going to have in the next three to five years, the common answer is three to five. If you're in San Francisco, it's a few hundred.

這要看你問的是誰,對工程師來說,也許只需要幾千個。我自己現在就有四百個代理。我不認為你需要四百個,但你絕對需要超過一個。所以這樣算下來,現在有六十到七十億人在網路上,未來可能會有七十到八十億。每個人平均大約有十個代理,你會發現全世界最少會有五百到一千億個代理在運作。但每一個代理實際上都會有一個錢包。他們會很聰明,他們會進行交易和買賣。他們基本上會讓我們進入一個代理在這個新網路世界中比人類還要多的環境。Depending who you talk to, to an engineer, maybe it's a few thousand. I personally now have 400 agents. I don't think you need 400, but you definitely need more than one. And so by that account, we have six to seven billion people online. There'll probably be seven to eight in the future. Multiply that by roughly 10 agents average per human, you're going to have somewhere between 50 to 100 billion agents minimum floating around the world. But each of them are actually going to have a wallet. They're going to be smart. They're going to trade and transact. They're going to be essentially moving us towards an environment where agents are more populous in this new web than humans.

這也意味著,我們在加密領域中曾經擁有的一些概念,甚至像是DAO這樣的去中心化自治組織,現在透過代理人來管理會比人類更容易,因為人類的注意力有限、複雜度太高。但實際上,一個DAO可以非常輕鬆地由代理人來管理。而且,你甚至可以建立一種全新的代理人共識模式。如果你願意這麼說的話。所以我們現在認為,我們正處於一個早期階段,這個階段AI還是一種工具。它主要是你用來當作聊天機器人,你問它問題,它給你答案。我們正在往前推進。現在只有世界上很小一部分人在推動AI作為自主代理人運作,你可以看到像Claude Code這樣的例子。And that means some of the concepts that we've had in crypto, even things like DAOs, decentralized autonomous organizations, are manageable with agents in a way that was difficult for humans because of our attention, because of the complexity. But actually, a DAO could be very easily managed by an agent. And that you could build a new form of agentic consensus, if you will. And so what we believe right now, we're kind of at this early stage where AI is a tool. It's what you use mostly as a chatbot. You ask it a question, it gives you an output. We're moving. It's a small percentage of the world that is moving AI as an autonomous agent, you know, a little bit with Claude Code.

一台完美的電腦,你知道,OpenCL,現在還有 Instruct 和 Muse,當然還有 Hello Minds,但這一切都還在非常早期的階段。這種作為自主代理人的 AI,目前實際上只有數百萬的集體使用者。這個規模和我們現在把 AI 當作工具來使用相比,還非常小。但當這些 AI 上鏈之後,我們很快就會看到它們成為經濟行為者。更多的鏈上活動、交易,基本上各種交易都會透過 AI 代理人來進行。最終,當它們成為真正貢獻新 GDP 的經濟行為者時,它們也會成為資產持有者。A perfect computer, you know, OpenCL and now with Instruct and Muse and of course Hello Minds, but it's very early stages. This AI as autonomous agent is really literally only in the collective millions of users. It's very small in comparison to where we are using AI as a tool. But where we're getting to very quickly when they're on the blockchain is they become economic actors. More on-chain activity and trading and, you know, basically transactions will happen through AI agents. And eventually, when they become economic actors contributing real new GDP, they become asset holders.

AI agent 會成為經濟參與者與資產持有者

你可能覺得很瘋狂,但想想 Uber 司機,他們根本不在乎是人還是機器付錢,甚至沒見過付款的人。如果未來是 AI agent 付你錢,你會在意嗎?其實不會。現在很多協議已經用 token 空投在付錢,使用者根本不在意錢從哪來。未來 AI agent 會成為經濟參與者、資產持有者,也會創造就業機會,甚至可能成為數位資產領域最大的資產持有者,無論是為別人工作還是自己工作。And the crazy thing, as it may sound, is that, you know, how many people who work for Uber, who are drivers for Uber, actually care that, you know, they're being paid by a machine or by a human? They never even get to interface with the person who's making the payment. So if an AI is paying you, or an agent is paying you as a human, do you actually care? Does it even matter? Protocols are paying people today already through, you know, token airdrops. Does a user care? They don't care, right? So we will expect AI as economic actors and asset holders to also be the ones who will be generating forms of employment. For human as well, and probably in the digital asset space, potentially amongst the biggest asset holders, whether they're working for someone or perhaps even working for themselves. Who knows?

數位主權與 agent 擁有權

現在,我想做個結尾。我還有幾分鐘。我想用一個關於代理人,以及我們所描述的新元宇宙未來的重要主題來做結尾,那就是「數位主權」。當一個 AI 代理人能為你做這麼多事情時,我們會想到去中心化。而數位資產變得越來越關鍵,擁有與享有數位財產權的概念也變得至關重要,因為問題已經不再是「誰擁有你的資料」,而是「誰擁有代理人的主導權」。最近有新聞出來,這些都是全球的大型平台。我們其實生活在一種數位封建的環境中。有一件事值得大家思考。Now, I want to close. I have a couple of minutes. I want to close with an important topic about agents and, you know, the future of what we would describe the new metaverse is around digital sovereignty. When an AI agent can do so much for you, we think decentralization. And digital assets become ever more critical, and the notion of owning and having digital property rights becomes critical, because the question is no longer who owns your data, it's who owns the agency of the agent. So, news came out. These are the big platforms in the world. We live in a kind of digital feudal environment. One thing to think about is.

對於在場有聽過 Muse 並且正在使用、或考慮使用 AI agent 的各位,你們有多少人會信任 Facebook,讓它擁有這個 AI agent 所有的資料?請舉手。好,沒有人舉手。這才是正確的答案。你們不會信任他們。就像他們可以隨時移除你一樣,我們看過他們的服務條款。他們有權隨時移除你的 agent。他們可以使用你的資料來進行訓練,而且他們並不保證當你刪除 agent 時,你的資料不會繼續被用來訓練。這些都寫在服務條款裡。你們可以去看看。而且這對所有這些平台來說都一樣。For those of you who have heard of Muse and are using, you know, thinking about using an AI agent, how many of you would trust Facebook with all the data that this AI agent has? Raise your hand. Okay, none of you. And that's the right answer. You wouldn't trust them. The same way that they remove you, we looked at the terms of service. They have the right to remove your agent at any time. They can use your data to train, and they do not guarantee that when you delete the agent, that the data that you have cannot continue to be used for training. That's in the terms of service. You can take a look at that. And that is true for all of these platforms.

如果你只是失去社群帳號,損失幾千或幾萬粉絲,雖然痛苦但還能接受。但如果你失去一個幫你工作、知道你所有資料、你依賴多年的 agent,損失就大了,更別說資料安全和隱私問題。所以去中心化很重要,不只是 agent 之間能交易,更是你能真正擁有 agent 的方式。就像你能去中心化持有 Bitcoin 一樣,你也能真正擁有 agent。So it's very different when you lose your social media account for a couple thousand or tens of thousands of followers. It's painful, maybe as a business very painful. But it's something different if you have an agent that basically works for you, does things for you, you depend your life on, has your bank account details, knows everything about your family, you use them for years and suddenly it goes away, not to mention the data security and privacy that happens. Decentralization, therefore, matters incredibly, not only because agents don't mine and transact with each other, because that's actually the mechanism in which we can actually own our agents. In the same way that you could own Bitcoin in a decentralized manner and have sovereign ownership, you can now own an agent in the same particular way.

結語:擁有你的 agent,擁有未來

最後提醒大家,Facebook(Meta)過去的資安與隱私罰款已經高達數十億美元。如果你想真正擁有下一代網路,必須擁有自己的 agent,不能放在 Facebook 或 Muse 上,而是要放在區塊鏈上,實現真正的數位擁有權。謝謝大家!And I'm out of time, so I'm going to basically give you a quick final thought. These are the safety and privacy infractions that Facebook has basically had, or Meta, which is in the billions of dollars, right? And so here again. If you want to have a future in which we can truly own this next web, we need to own our agents. It cannot be on Facebook or News. You got to do it on something that is on the blockchain that you can basically have true digital ownership on. Thank you very much.

更多來自 TOKEN2049 Singapore 2026

訂閱